 | | Re: 2532 Passenger Jet: Your worst fears realized...
|
| It's OK for parts, but it is nothing like, oh, #6375, the Trans-Air Carrier. Now that was a cargo plane! :) Scott Sanburn (...) (26 years ago, 22-Apr-99, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: 2532 Passenger Jet: Your worst fears realized...
|
| Scott, Actually, if you compare 2532 to 6375, they're not much different. The cargo version has more wheels and engines, but the fuselage is almost identical (including the hinged roof opening). [shrug] Gene (...) (26 years ago, 23-Apr-99, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: 2532 Passenger Jet: Your worst fears realized...
|
| Well, I have two #6375, and the color scheme was great. It also has two mini vehicles, the forklift and the little car. The cargo logos were "printed" on the parts, and the back of the plane folded out to put cargo in the back. The side of the (...) (26 years ago, 23-Apr-99, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: 2532 Passenger Jet: Your worst fears realized...
|
| Scott, I guess what I was most referring to was the size and the hinged roof being almost identical. Since I don't have 6375 and haven't opened 2532, I can't really comment on anything other than a comparison of the cover art. Gene (...) (26 years ago, 23-Apr-99, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: 2532 Passenger Jet: Your worst fears realized...
|
| Gene & All, I am not saying 2532 is a bad set, it is OK for parts. But compared to earlier sets, such as 6375, 1818 (Another airline special set, by the way!), even #6368 (The first year the airplane windows came out, 1985, I believe), 2532 is a bad (...) (26 years ago, 23-Apr-99, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: 2532 Passenger Jet: Your worst fears realized...
|
| Scott, (...) Agreed. And none hard feelings taken. Gene (26 years ago, 23-Apr-99, to lugnet.general)
| |
