To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 35863
35862  |  35864
Subject: 
Re: A moc term question
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general
Date: 
Wed, 27 Feb 2002 20:24:29 GMT
Viewed: 
895 times
  
Hiya Shiri :)
I figure i'll stick with MOC, because yes it is a acronym and the person I'm
writing (a
real hand written letter!) to actually knows what it means.
--
Nicole~
http://www.geocities.com/duelarcane1

"Shiri Dori" <shirid@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Gs7080.Jqv@lugnet.com...
<snip>
To answer the original question, English acronyms tend to be in captial so • I
would go with MOC, rather than Moc. because it's not an abbreviation, it's
an acronym (like SCUBA - although that is so accepted by now, it's rarely
capitalized).

-Shiri



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: A moc term question
 
(...) Hmm, I know what you mean. :-) In Hebrew, the way to annotate acronyms is with a double-quote: MO"C. But it looks very weird in English. And while we're comparing notes, in hebrew My Own Creation = ha-yetzira sheli, ye"sh, hehe, that is (...) (23 years ago, 27-Feb-02, to lugnet.general)

8 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR