Subject:
|
Re: I miss the old LUGNET...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Sat, 3 Nov 2001 17:10:39 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1363 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Amy Hughes writes:
> In lugnet.general, Eric Sophie writes:
> > Also, I was really upset by this as well:
> > http://news.lugnet.com/build/mecha/?n=3456
> > I posted this to .michlug because I like and respect the group and admire
> > their club, I happen to think there are alot of good builders out there
> > and that's why I cross posted the story,
>
> We're flattered, but we're also no less busy than anyone else.
> When we have the time and the desire, we read groups that aren't
> for the business of our club (and that's what .org.michlug is
> for - our club's business). When you post your article where it
> is on-topic, people who are interested in that topic - including us
> MichLUGers - will see it. It's not necessary to post everywhere
> to make sure we see it.
>
> People often make the mistake of assuming their post is so important
> that *everyone* should see it. This is narcisism, and, sorry, I have
> little patience for it.
Woof! (inside joke)
Let's let this one go now. Eric has posted that he understands why wide
crossposting isn't always ideal.
As a side note, though: The way that community norms get adhered to is by
pointing them out. The way that community norms get changed is by
discussion. Doing your part to keep the community the way you understand it
is intended to be, and to help shape its change and growth does not make you
a "policeman" it makes you a *contributor* to the health and life of the
community.
Amy was not being a "policeman" in first pointing this out, back when, she
was being a valued community member. Fortunately for her, because I spoke up
in support, *I* (since I seem to be a lightning rod for controversy) got
tarred by Eric's brush rather than her in his more recent post, (which he
has subsequently retracted, thanks muchly!) and by the brush of others, some
of whom really ought to tend to their own behaviours first before they
criticise.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
105 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
