To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 33391
    Re: 6776 Should not be re-released. —Larry Pieniazek
   (...) Ooooh! Sharp pointy objects! And shiny too! (...) It is NOT *at all* baffling to anyone who's ever played Illuminati. Obviously whichever Illuminati controls "LEGO" (alignments: peaceful, straight, power 3/1 resistance 2, income 3, 1 out (...) (23 years ago, 27-Sep-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
   
        Re: 6776 Should not be re-released. —Wayne McCaul
     Man, that's freaky. For a second, I thought the INWO list was talking about the Lego issue... not vice versa. :P Evil Wayne ___...___ "There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness." (...) (23 years ago, 27-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
   
        Re: 6776 Should not be re-released. —James Brown
   (...) Or The Network. Ever seen a LEGO set that didn't have a UPC code? (...) LOL! I think I've got some cards to make up when I go home... Fnord. James (23 years ago, 27-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
   
        Re: 6776 Should not be re-released. —Larry Pieniazek
   (...) Well I would definitely argue strongly that LEGO Fans ought to have either 0 or -1 income... our addiction is a source of expense that consumes all else. The other values I gave seem about right although I haven't playtested extensively. (...) (23 years ago, 27-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
   
        Re: 6776 Should not be re-released. —Lindsay Frederick Braun
   (...) But what about the LEGO Fan Parts Merchant? :D (...) Hey, did someone hear something?fnord LFB (23 years ago, 27-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR