Subject:
|
Re: Terrorist Attacks on America
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 12 Sep 2001 00:59:07 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3643 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Suzanne D. Rich writes:
> Ross Crawford wrote:
> >
> > In lugnet.general, Suzanne D. Rich writes:
> > > Matthew Gerber wrote:
> > > >
> > > > NEWS:
> > > >
> > > > Richard Shelby, US Intellegence: US was caught flat-footed...
> > > >
> > > > Building 7 at WTC has just collapsed due to chain reaction of airliner
> > > > strikes and fires.
> > > A simple map of WTC buildings:
> > > http://www.angelfire.com/home/iNetwork/NYC/w-center.gif
> >
> > Thanks for that Suz. Strange that building 7 went next - I would have • thought
> > the closer buildings would have sustained more damage when 1 & 2 collapsed. • But
> > it makes no difference really...
>
> They just said on ABC that fire fighters have given up on the hotel
> building, and that it's in very bad shape. I assume they mean number 3
> on the map.
>
> And earlier today it was mentioned that building number 5 was in danger
> of collapse.
Well I'm no engineer, and from the pictures I've seen it's difficult to tell
how much of 1 & 2 collapsed, but its hard to see any of the close buildings
surviving - the shock waves created by the collapse would have caused major
damage.
ROSCO
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Terrorist Attacks on America
|
| (...) They just said on ABC that fire fighters have given up on the hotel building, and that it's in very bad shape. I assume they mean number 3 on the map. And earlier today it was mentioned that building number 5 was in danger of collapse. -Suz (23 years ago, 12-Sep-01, to lugnet.general)
|
133 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
