Subject:
|
Re: Terrorist Attacks on America
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 12 Sep 2001 00:20:27 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
suz@baseplate^saynotospam^.com
|
Viewed:
|
3931 times
|
| |
|
|
Ross Crawford wrote:
>
> In lugnet.general, Suzanne D. Rich writes:
> > Matthew Gerber wrote:
> > >
> > > NEWS:
> > >
> > > Richard Shelby, US Intellegence: US was caught flat-footed...
> > >
> > > Building 7 at WTC has just collapsed due to chain reaction of airliner
> > > strikes and fires.
> > A simple map of WTC buildings:
> > http://www.angelfire.com/home/iNetwork/NYC/w-center.gif
>
> Thanks for that Suz. Strange that building 7 went next - I would have thought
> the closer buildings would have sustained more damage when 1 & 2 collapsed. But
> it makes no difference really...
They just said on ABC that fire fighters have given up on the hotel
building, and that it's in very bad shape. I assume they mean number 3
on the map.
And earlier today it was mentioned that building number 5 was in danger
of collapse.
-Suz
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Terrorist Attacks on America
|
| (...) thought (...) But (...) Well I'm no engineer, and from the pictures I've seen it's difficult to tell how much of 1 & 2 collapsed, but its hard to see any of the close buildings surviving - the shock waves created by the collapse would have (...) (23 years ago, 12-Sep-01, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
133 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
