 | | Re: Should we be worried about shop@home?
|
| (...) lowering prices. (...) middleman and make more profit. (...) I think you may be overlooking the important point that Lego may notbe trying to "cut out" anyone, but rather offer a place where buyers can get access to their full line. I'd bet (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jul-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.market.theory)
| | | | | Re: Should we be worried about shop@home?
|
| "Troy Cefaratti" <mnementh@dsl.telocity.com> wrote in message news:GH6wyC.2A5@lugnet.com... (...) That's the retail channel that it is protecting by not allowing them to sell all the new juicy SAH exclusives is it? Or the retail channel that it (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jul-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.market.theory)
| | | | | Re: Should we be worried about shop@home?
|
| (...) <snip> (...) (IMHO / ymmv) Shop at Home is both a profit and a cost center. Having people to answer the phones, take order, package and ship does not come for free. I do not know how TLC does the internal dollars, but I would not be surprised (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jul-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.market.theory)
| |
