Subject:
|
Re: the whole truth and nothing but the truth
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 23 May 2001 14:37:32 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1408 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.lego.direct, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.lego.direct, Shiri Dori writes:
> > In lugnet.lego.direct, Jeff Thompson writes:
> > > However, if "set size" really is an issue, they could bundle
> > > together a few sets like sets 6041 (armour shop), 6040 (weaponsmith),
> > > and 6067 (inn) and 6048 (wizard's workshop) into a "make your
> > > own medieval village" larger and more profitable playset.
> > >
> > > Well, it's fun to dream!
> >
> > It sure is. ;-) And I swear someday I'll be castle complete - with or
> > without TLC's help. ;-)
>
> That kind of DOES beg the question, to all you completists out there (and I
> know, I know, complete is by definition what it means to *you*).
>
> Suppose you are a Pirate completist... (the three pirate sets have new numbers)
>
> If you already have RBR, do you need to get the new RBR to remain complete?
> Conversely, if you did not already have RBR, would getting just the new one
> make you complete?
I'm inclined to say no, but I'm an "I've got all the ones I want"
completist, so my opinion may weigh in for less. Certainly there will be
nutbars(1) out there that will insist you aren't complete unless you have
both; There are people buying all 20 iterations of My Train, neh?
> I am wondering why new numbers were used. Sets have had different packaging
> or packaging revisions in the past and still used the same numbers.
I suspect new packaging was used because this is a different product scheme.
It *isn't* Pirate or Technic or Town, it's Classic. Different marketing,
different packaging, different target.
James
1:No offense meant to any rectangular nut products. ;)
|
|
1 Message in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
