To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 29178
29177  |  29179
Subject: 
Re: 20 Years of TLC's Frustration with "LEGOS"
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general
Date: 
Thu, 29 Mar 2001 02:54:02 GMT
Viewed: 
2833 times
  
In lugnet.general, Bryan Beckwith writes:
I thought the point wasn't to stop other brands from being called LEGOS, but
to keep LEGO bricks from simply being called LEGOS.  This makes sense for a
company that wishes to be known for more than building blocks.  TLC never
intended for their company name to become the name of their toy.  Your Ford
example doesn't really work.  A better example would be Whammo asking people
to call their plastic hoops Hula Hoops rather than Whammos.  (Not that
anyone calls them Whammos, but you get the idea.  It would be hard for your
company to release new/different products if it were only known for a single
product or line of products.)

But why would the LEGO company want to release anything other than plastic
building bricks? It's what they're good at. They have nothing like the same
expertise in other product lines, which would surely distract company and
consumer focus from their profitable and world-renowned "LEGO bricks". Right?
What would be the point of a clothing and accessories range, for instance? Or
bastardising an educational product like LEGO Technic into collectible action
figures with collectible gimmicks?

</remove tongue from cheek>
--DaveL



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: 20 Years of TLC's Frustration with "LEGOS"
 
LEGO hasn't always been known for building blocks. IIRC the Ultimate LEGO Book says one of TLC's most successful product launches was a plastic tractor. TLC also (originally) made lots of wooden toys. I can only imagine that when the message was (...) (24 years ago, 29-Mar-01, to lugnet.general)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: 20 Years of TLC's Frustration with "LEGOS"
 
I thought the point wasn't to stop other brands from being called LEGOS, but to keep LEGO bricks from simply being called LEGOS. This makes sense for a company that wishes to be known for more than building blocks. TLC never intended for their (...) (24 years ago, 29-Mar-01, to lugnet.general)

137 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR