Subject:
|
Re: The Kjeld Billionometer
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 7 Mar 2001 02:08:02 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1083 times
|
| |
|
|
In article <3AA5574E.7D55@mindspring.com>,
Frank Filz <ffilz@mindspring.com> wrote:
> Interesting, they lost 0.028 billion, yet Kirk's personal wealth still
> grew 0.3 billion... Obviously he has been investing his wealth somewhere
> else besides just TLC...
Probably, but also note that a company can, strangely enough, lose money
and become more valuable at the same time. Take, for example, Amazon, whose
stock shot up like Discovery... have they actually turned a profit yet?
-JDF
--
J.D. Forinash ,-.
foxtrot@cc.gatech.edu ( <
The more you learn, the better your luck gets. `-'
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: The Kjeld Billionometer
|
| (...) Yea, if we had a billion dollars to spend on LEGO, we would double the annual production (note the sales of 1.1 billion...). Gee, I wonder how many custom sets you could convince them to make if you have a billion bucks to throw around... (...) (24 years ago, 6-Mar-01, to lugnet.general)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
