To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 2828
2827  |  2829
Subject: 
Re: TLG investigation 1st answers
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general
Date: 
Mon, 22 Feb 1999 21:56:59 GMT
Viewed: 
1607 times
  
On Mon, 22 Feb 1999 21:28:31 GMT, "Josh Spaulding"
<josh_spaulding@hotmail.com> wrote:

oops.

Josh Spaulding writes:

the big composite peices are awful: 5 1x2x1 bricks
are almost always worse than 1 1x2x5 brick.

BETTER. I meant that the smaller pieces are BETTER in this example.

I'd disagree, sort of.  A free-standing 1x2x5 brick is stronger than a
stack of 1x2x1 bricks.

But a 1x20x5 wall is better when built from 1xnx1 bricks than 1x2x5
bricks.

Steve



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: TLG investigation 1st answers
 
oops. (...) BETTER. I meant that the smaller pieces are BETTER in this example. Josh Spaulding (URL) (26 years ago, 22-Feb-99, to lugnet.general)

164 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR