To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 2827
2826  |  2828
Subject: 
Re: TLG investigation 1st answers
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general
Date: 
Mon, 22 Feb 1999 21:28:31 GMT
Viewed: 
1393 times
  
oops.

Josh Spaulding writes:

the big composite peices are awful: 5 1x2x1 bricks
are almost always worse than 1 1x2x5 brick.

BETTER. I meant that the smaller pieces are BETTER in this example.

Josh Spaulding
http://members.tripod.com/~josh_spaulding



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: TLG investigation 1st answers
 
(...) I'd disagree, sort of. A free-standing 1x2x5 brick is stronger than a stack of 1x2x1 bricks. But a 1x20x5 wall is better when built from 1xnx1 bricks than 1x2x5 bricks. Steve (25 years ago, 22-Feb-99, to lugnet.general)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: TLG investigation 1st answers
 
(...) I can't find fault with either of those statements, but I must point out that developing a product for kids does not require "dumbing it down." Let's use some examples. The Star Wars movies and merchandise were not generally "dumbed down," yet (...) (25 years ago, 22-Feb-99, to lugnet.general)

164 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR