 | | Re: !!!IMPORTANT!!!-SPUDS No fault of TLG-!!!IMPORTANT!!! —James Wilson
|
| | | Tim, I agree with just about everything you said. The solution, as I see it, is stricter "age-rating" by TLC. POOPS, SPUDS, and SA's (and other acronyms for combining pieces) _DO_ have their place, IHMO, as "transitional elements" for younger (...) (23 years ago, 26-Feb-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: !!!IMPORTANT!!!-SPUDS No fault of TLG-!!!IMPORTANT!!! —Fredrik Glöckner
|
| | | | | (...) I remember when I was a child, I really loved every new specialized part that arrived. I was lucky enough to experience the dawn of classic space at five years old, and I just couldn't get enough of the new parts present in classic space: The (...) (23 years ago, 26-Feb-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: !!!IMPORTANT!!!-SPUDS No fault of TLG-!!!IMPORTANT!!! —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | (...) If one were speculating one could certainly speculate in that direction. Tooling costs do need to be amortized, after all. (...) Makes it easier to do the instructions and easier to assemble. As well as balancing out color loading. (...) Seems (...) (23 years ago, 26-Feb-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: !!!IMPORTANT!!!-SPUDS No fault of TLG-!!!IMPORTANT!!! —James Simpson
|
| | | | (...) I'm not sold on this idea that there needs to be a transition between Duplo and System that uses POOPs. Who among us was seriously challenged by th 2x4 brick when we were 5 years old? When we were 4 years old? Heck, even 3-years-old? Nope. I'm (...) (23 years ago, 26-Feb-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: !!!IMPORTANT!!!-SPUDS No fault of TLG-!!!IMPORTANT!!! —Kyle D. Jackson
|
| | | | (...) This is an interesting point. When I was in the 3-4 range, I don't think I even had wooden building blocks. I got my first LEGO Basic set around 4 I guess. By 5/6 I was into the Legoland sets and never looked back. I never had any kind of (...) (23 years ago, 27-Feb-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | | |
