Subject:
|
Re: Not at all a pact with the devil...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 22 Jan 2001 11:31:10 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1097 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Geoffrey Hyde writes:
> Todd said:
> > Larry said:
> > > That bias already leaks through in your technology decisions as it is.
> >
> > I should hope so.
>
> I'm not sure what you meant to say here? Bias?? To whom is Larry talking?
I was talking to Todd, claiming that his antiMS bias is so strong that it
may be causing him to make bad technology decisions in some cases.
> Larry or Jake??
I wasn't talking to myself or to Jake, but rather to Todd.
> Taken as is I'd have thought Todd was responding to Larry's
> criticism of Jake, but what he said doesn't seem to make sense if he's
> talking to Larry.
I was criticising Todd, not Jake, and I think Todd was in turn responding to me.
> This thread seems like an excellent point of discussion for replied text
> that gets broken because it gets carted across newsgroups and doesn't
> follow-up to the original group.
I think it was fine if the attributions were preserved... if I inadvertantly
trimmed one I apologise.
> I'm confused - anyone want to explain?
HTH...
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Not at all a pact with the devil...
|
| Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message news:G7JoKH.609@lugnet.com... (...) source (...) which I (...) PMI, but what's 'jocosely' mean? *wonders if this should stay here or go to o-t.fun ...* (...) I'm not sure what you meant to say here? (...) (26 years ago, 22-Jan-01, to lugnet.general)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
