 | | Re: Virtual Flower Delivery Service —Tom Stangl
| | | | Well, my point is he still didn't make a mistake. As I said, I followed it, as I knew what was up. If you DIDN'T know about baseplate, and here's my point... ***Why should the reader spend their time to visit a link to verify it is NOT spam?*** (...) (26 years ago, 18-Feb-99, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Virtual Flower Delivery Service —Mike Stanley
| | | | | | (...) Fried with mayo on white bread is better. (26 years ago, 18-Feb-99, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Virtual Flower Delivery Service —Tom Stangl
| | | | | | | Hm, HeartAttack Special, right? No thanks, fried with ketchup is a bad enough artery clogger. (...) -- | Tom Stangl, Technical Support Netscape Communications Corp | | Please do not associate my personal views with my employer | (26 years ago, 19-Feb-99, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Virtual Flower Delivery Service —Jasper Janssen
| | | | | | (...) Because he's taking the time to flame the original poster? I mean, sure, you don't need to visit a spam-like link, but you also don't have to flame - in a public forum, no less - the original poster. Much better either to email or to check it, (...) (26 years ago, 18-Feb-99, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Virtual Flower Delivery Service —Kevin Bracey
| | | | | (...) Ah, but conversely, why should he _post_ a response to something he thinks is spam? Totally pointless, and just increases the disruption caused by a spam. Anyway, people should think before they post. They sometimes seem to forget that they're (...) (26 years ago, 19-Feb-99, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | | |
