To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 25036
  Re: LEGO Company Welcomes Adult LEGO Enthusiasts
 
(...) Are you saying you would not post the pictures as you want to keep your copying antics secret, or because we’d not be interested? (...) The only problem I have with people copyrighting their own designs is that we have all most all benefited (...) (24 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.general)
 
  Re: LEGO Company Welcomes Adult LEGO Enthusiasts
 
(...) I think it would be kept secret because it would bring out a lot of bad blood. I mean, come on...if you want one of my sets, buy it. It's not like I am selling them for a excessive amount, when you start looking at the parts prices I have paid (...) (24 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.general)
 
  Re: LEGO Company Welcomes Adult LEGO Enthusiasts
 
(...) Hah! Man, I am so glad you said this instead of me. I have been laughing out loud for months over this... =) Anyway, maybe it's ironically fitting -- it kinda says it all. I dunno. People here get SO serious about stuff. I agree that giving (...) (24 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.general)
 
  Re: LEGO Company Welcomes Adult LEGO Enthusiasts
 
(...) Because you most likely wouldn't be interested. If someone else creates something, and posts it to Lugnet/Brickshelf/the internet in general, I wouldn't see the reason to post pictures of my copy of it. What's the point? If I think it's (...) (24 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.general)
 
  Re: LEGO Company Welcomes Adult LEGO Enthusiasts
 
(...) No, as I said before, out of simple disinterest. If I build a copy of something someone else built, what is the point of discussing it? What purpose could discussing it possibly serve? What would I gain as the poster, and what would people (...) (24 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.general)
 
  Re: LEGO Company Welcomes Adult LEGO Enthusiasts
 
(...) No. I would be upset if you went and copied the entire set from the images provided to help sell the set on my web page. (see below) (...) Guild (...) Yes, I do understand that other members do not feel exactly the same. I would be quite (...) (24 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: LEGO Company Welcomes Adult LEGO Enthusiasts
 
(...) So, in other words, "yes". 1) Fred decides Fred likes your design, and would like to have it in his train layout, in his basement. Fred has an extensive LEGO collection already, though, and has all the parts he needs. 2) Fred sits down with a (...) (24 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: LEGO Company Welcomes Adult LEGO Enthusiasts
 
(...) Um, I'm not sure I disagree with James about anything. I'm mildly upset and disappointed when someone chooses to copy my work, but I'm also kind of flattered. Neither of those emotions translate into my actually *doing* anything about it, as (...) (24 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.general)
 
  Re: LEGO Company Welcomes Adult LEGO Enthusiasts
 
(...) This is where you're making your mistake: We aren't talking about someone selling sets that resemble GoB sets. We *are* talking about someone building the set FOR THEIR OWN USE without buying it. I agree completely that if someone copied one (...) (24 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.general)
 
  Re: LEGO Company Welcomes Adult LEGO Enthusiasts
 
(...) That's not how I read (URL) James' later posts. I think James is saying he will take you to court if you look at a picture of his creation and try to build it out of your own bricks, even if you don't then sell it. Later he backpedals slightly (...) (24 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.general)
 
  Re: LEGO Company Welcomes Adult LEGO Enthusiasts
 
(...) I can get upset if I want. I can be flattered if I want. I can be both at the same time if I want. I can do so for any reason or no reason at all if I want. What I won't do (and what James won't do) is *do* anything about it, other than (...) (24 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.general)
 
  Re: LEGO Company Welcomes Adult LEGO Enthusiasts
 
(...) That is what I thought you meant. Scott A (...) (24 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.general)
 
  Re: LEGO Company Welcomes Adult LEGO Enthusiasts
 
(...) Yes. This is what I was thinking - I jsut did not type it. (...) By copied, I assume you mean re-drafted - otherwise it happens all the time. (...) But could Lego not argue that you are using/adapting thier ideas to build your sets - eg click (...) (24 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.general)
 
  Re: LEGO Company Welcomes Adult LEGO Enthusiasts
 
(...) Why does it disappoint you? I've spent all my working life trying to get others to copy me. (...) I doubt LEGO will put GoBed sets in the shops. Or if they did, they'd dumb them down a little - would have accept that at even 0.006 / brick? (...) (24 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.general)
 
  Re: LEGO Company Welcomes Adult LEGO Enthusiasts
 
(cross-posting to o-t.debate, this falls in between the cracks, I think. If it moves more Lego-wards, please drop .debate, vice versa if it moves more off-topic. Thanks) (...) OBDisclaimer: IMHO! I don't know James' mind(1), or yours, but FWIW, I (...) (24 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: LEGO Company Welcomes Adult LEGO Enthusiasts
 
(...) I think I understand what the point is but, we are usually working from a picture or the actual building/engine and I don't see credits that the model is representive of a pix in Model Railroading or the the XYZ building in town A. When is a (...) (24 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR