To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 1983
    Re: MiniFig Ponderings? —David Zorn
    Tim McSweeney wrote in message ... :Why do MiniFig legs have such long studs on top to attatch them to bodies? :What's wrong with Normal Studs? sure they'd be a bit weaker but it works OK :for the witch minifig. :Why break the standard in this one (...) (26 years ago, 13-Jan-99, to lugnet.general)
   
        Re: MiniFig Ponderings? —Mike Stanley
     (...) Or fanny packs. :) (26 years ago, 13-Jan-99, to lugnet.general)
    
         Re: MiniFig Ponderings? —Tim Courtney
      (...) Then they come out with minifig excercise sets and aerobics classrooms! :) -Tim (26 years ago, 13-Jan-99, to lugnet.general)
     
          Re: MiniFig Ponderings? —Robert M. Dye
      (...) New for '99! LEGO aeroboids. Just when you thought it was safe to go back in the health club... 8) Rob (26 years ago, 6-Jan-99, to lugnet.general)
    
         Re: MiniFig Ponderings? —Steve Anderson
      Mike Stanley wrote in message ... (...) That has *such* a different meaning in the UK! Steve ---...--- Why not visit Llegogogoch? (URL) (26 years ago, 13-Jan-99, to lugnet.general)
   
        Re: MiniFig Ponderings? —Jasper Janssen
   (...) The original minifigs, which had just slightly altered 1*2*1 2/3 bricks as legs and body (with arms legs molded in, not movable, no hands) had regulars studs. I believe they only produced thos for a couple of years, before switching to the (...) (26 years ago, 18-Jan-99, to lugnet.general)
 

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR