Subject:
|
Re: A good juniorisation experiment to try...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Sat, 8 Jul 2000 22:11:49 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1231 times
|
| |
|
|
Hmm... do we get to keep the Flame Fighters when the experiment is over?
In lugnet.general, Jonathan Wilson writes:
> Here is what you do:
> Get a sample of the lego community, AFOLS, lego loving kids (with AFOL
> and non AFOL parents), non afol parents etc.
> Get a non junorized fire station set like flame fighters ot whatever
> represents the pinicle of lego town and get the current junorised fire
> station (which represents the worst of lego town...) and then give both
> sets, one after the other to each person in the sample group. let them
> play/look at/whatever the sets and gove their opinions on which is
> better.
> Which one would the kids like to play with more?
> Which one would the AFOLS like to play with more?
> Which one would the parents buy? (this is the really important one,
> especially what the non afol parents would say, because they probobly
> dont know a thing about junorisation. Make sure that some kind of retail
> price figure is quoted for both sets, because that will affect the
> outcome)
>
> Then write this all up and find out the real feelings on junorisation.
> Then package it up all nicely into a professional looking report and
> give it to TLG. This will (hopefully) prove that junorisation is not
> good.
>
> N.B. I chose fire stations because the current one is good example of
> junorisation and there are good ones to compare it to.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | A good juniorisation experiment to try...
|
| Here is what you do: Get a sample of the lego community, AFOLS, lego loving kids (with AFOL and non AFOL parents), non afol parents etc. Get a non junorized fire station set like flame fighters ot whatever represents the pinicle of lego town and get (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jul-00, to lugnet.general)
|
2 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
