 | | When is a set a set? —Steve Bliss
|
| | | OK, here is a zen question for the Set-Purists[1] to ponder: I bought a bag of lego at a garage sale. Among other things, it included pieces and instructions for two small sets. Both sets can be built (simultaneously) from the pieces in the bag, (...) (26 years ago, 12-Jan-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: When is a set a set? —Mark de Kock
|
| | | | | Steve Bliss writes: <<SNIP>>> (...) <<SNIP again>> IMHO: a set is a set when it has everything it says in the instructions. This is including the minifig(s)because they are clearly present in the instructions. Ergo: you have one complete set and one (...) (26 years ago, 12-Jan-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: When is a set a set? —Eric Brok
|
| | | | | Steve Bliss wrote in message <369b510b.4248718@lu...et.com>... (...) Looks like this is an American minifig, holding two jobs, time-sharing his assets. Eric (Responses to lugnet.off-topic.deb...e.culture) (26 years ago, 12-Jan-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: When is a set a set? —Joshua Delahunty
|
| | | | (...) Primarily, Element Count rules. Whichever set is larger, that's the complete set, and the set to which the Mini-Figure belongs. If the sets are close in size, or if the element is sufficiently rare, then a very rare element will of course (...) (26 years ago, 16-Jan-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
