Subject:
|
Re: Lego piece with studs on top and bottom
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general, lugnet.town
|
Date:
|
Tue, 16 May 2000 12:33:16 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
959 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.town, Paul Baulch writes:
> I found that a lot of my older 1x1 plate-with-light-holders broke, so that I
> had many of the light holders without the plate. They were great to use in
> MOCs to reverse stud direction, but was this an "illegal" use of "modified"
> Lego elements, even though they weren't intentionally broken? Should I have
> thrown them out, never used them? Seems like a waste :-)
I'm in the purist camp. But if it feels good to you, do it. Don't worry about
what other people think. Just take the good natured ribbing from people like me
in stride.
Myself, I'd give away the broken parts, not throw them away. But then I'm a
purist. Did I say that already?
++Lar
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Lego piece with studs on top and bottom
|
| Fredrik Glöckner wrote in message ... (...) I found that a lot of my older 1x1 plate-with-light-holders broke, so that I had many of the light holders without the plate. They were great to use in MOCs to reverse stud direction, but was this an (...) (25 years ago, 16-May-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.town)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
