 | | Re: Set #148: Scales in Transition —Mark Koesel
| | | | Excellent point, Gary. So, really, scale is not the issue here. I think that is what I was trying to get at, but I could not put my finger on it, like you did. :) TLC, does not seem to be concerned with scale, and I don't think that is the crux of (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-00, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Set #148: Scales in Transition —Charles Eric McCarthy
| | | | | (...) I agree, the changing philosophy was the driving force, and the mix of scales is a consequence of that. It is interesting that the changing philosophy was not carried through consistently (e.g., with redesigned doors that the figs fit through) (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-00, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Set #148: Scales in Transition —Jonathan Wilson
| | | | | (...) I think that the bigeret fault by TLG ever is that the minifigs are selectivly compressed. (25 years ago, 10-May-00, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | | |
