 | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!) —Gary R. Istok
| | | | (...) Wow Mike, you really have set the "bar" higher as to your LEGO aspirations. Going against Conan. Wow, that would take some doing. The way I would suggest competing, is with "quality over quantity" (my own philosophy). But it doesn't hurt to (...) (25 years ago, 6-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!) —Mike Poindexter
| | | | | Gary Istok <gistok@umich.edu> wrote in message news:38C3CEAB.647015...ich.edu... (...) aspirations. Going (...) doesn't (...) Mr. I have more classic windows than the rest of Lugnet combined talking about not going for quantity? Your collection (...) (25 years ago, 6-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!) —Larry Pieniazek
| | | | | Excellent approach. It's standard MR technique to get enough of the layout running (even unscenicked) to keep your own interest high. THEN go crazy on superdetailing one area. (...) (25 years ago, 7-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
| | | | | | |
