 | | Mad Hatter and RTL (Was Re: Who documents rtl?) —Paul Baulch
| | | | Sproaticus wrote in message <388C8BED.3BCCF9F@io.com>... (...) final (...) to (...) Definitely, go to Deja-News and read the Mad Hatter thread. The poster known as "Mad Hatter" was not stupid. Egotistical, certainly. Immature, without doubt. Rude, (...) (24 years ago, 29-Jan-00, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Mad Hatter and RTL (Was Re: Who documents rtl?) —Gary R. Istok
| | | | | | (...) Well, um, uh, gee, thanks Paul. The Mad Hatter was actually not the only reason I left RTL. Time was another consideration. I just didn't have enough time to do both RTL and LUGNET justice. I really did see the good in Mr. Hatter. I saw (...) (24 years ago, 31-Jan-00, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Mad Hatter and RTL (Was Re: Who documents rtl?) —Steve Bliss
| | | | | In lugnet.general, Paul Baulch wrote: [snipped interesting analysis and color commentary of Mad Hatter bruhaha] I must have missed parts/most of the Mad Hatter thing. I don't think I did, but I must have. I feel the Mandroid mess was way worse than (...) (24 years ago, 31-Jan-00, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | | |
