 | | Re: Lugnet's great signal to noise ratio —Mike Stanley
|
| | | (...) Whahahaha, good one. Like people sit around wondering what gibberish I'll post next. :) (...) Cool, glad to hear it. :) (26 years ago, 12-Oct-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Lugnet's great signal to noise ratio —Sarah Heacock
|
| | | | (...) *smile* Just keep thinking that way. Sarah Heacock sarah@eskimo.com (26 years ago, 15-Oct-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Lugnet's great signal to noise ratio —Mike Stanley
|
| | | | (...) See? I can always count on Sarah to keep me honest. :) (26 years ago, 15-Oct-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Lugnet's great signal to noise ratio —Sarah Heacock
|
| | | | (...) The people at work say the exact same thing. I don't understand why... Sarah (26 years ago, 15-Oct-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
