Subject:
|
Re: Should RTL be hosted on this server?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 11 Dec 1998 13:39:13 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3301 times
|
| |
|
|
Todd Lehman (lehman@javanet.com) wrote:
> Crossposting is the sticky issue.
Yes.
> I don't think crossposting between lugnet.* groups and rec.toys.lego is
> particularly missed at the moment -- we hear people saying (when asked) that
> they'd like to see it, but not much of people speaking up about it without
> being asked.
That's because we (I anyway) are slightly egoistic. It
doesn't matter that much to me if RTL stays alive or not now
that I'm mainly reading Lugnet.
I expect that RTL'ers actually miss cross-posting from
Lugnet because the "big guys" have moved over here, and
don't post much on RTL anymore.
> Carrying rec.toys.lego here and not allowing crossposting changes the
> dynamics of things very little. Carrying rec.toys.lego here and allowing
> crossposting changes the dynamics of things quite a bit.
IMO there's no need to change things, if it doesn't change
the dynamics.
[...]
> Again, the advantages of carrying rec.toys.lego here include: • [...]
> - slow, halt, or reverse the "brain drain" away from rec.toys.lego
It will not make any difference for me if RTL is carried on Lugnet or
not. What _will_ make a difference is if I can cross-post my messages
to RTL.
I will present some suggestions (partially inspired by
Steve's articles on the subject of cross-posting):
I would like to see:
- Automatic cross-posting from all of the Lugnet groups to
RTL.
- Automatic sorting of RTL articles into
RTL.<lugnet-group> on Lugnet when the articles are
following up on Lugnet originated articles posted to
lugnet.<lugnet-group>. The remaining articles should
be stored in RTL or RTL.misc (maybe with junk - according
to the technical Lugnet definition - in RTL.junk).
I think it would be good because:
- It would allow RTL'ers to listen in on Lugnet
discussions.
- RTL-friendly Lugnet'ers would only have to read each
message once (with a cross-post-handling newsreader).
- It would reduce the use of disk space (assuming that
Lugnet carries RTL and that we're good guys and post our
articles to both RTL and the proper Lugnet group).
- It would make it easier to follow discussions where
non-Lugnet'ers take part.
I don't know how the Lugnet NNTP server can keep
non-Lugnet'ers' articles out of the lugnet.* groups, but I
assume that it isn't impossible or unfeasible.
Play well,
Jacob
----------------------------------------------
-- E-mail: Jacob.Sparre.Andersen@risoe.dk --
-- Web...: <URL:http://hugin.risoe.dk/> --
----------------------------------------------
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Should RTL be hosted on this server?
|
| Earlier, Jacob Sparre Andersen wrote stuff, most of which I agree with. (...) I don't think cross-posting all groups is a good idea. Particularly, groups like - lugnet.admin.database - lugnet.admin.statistics - lugnet.robotics - (...) (28 years ago, 11-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Should RTL be hosted on this server?
|
| (...) Still more discussion is needed, I think. Crossposting is the sticky issue. Let me summarize what I believe to be the crux of the matter -- and I apologize in advance that this will be mostly stream-of-consciousness... If rec.toys.lego were (...) (28 years ago, 8-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
132 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
