 | | Re: Lugnet's great signal to noise ratio —Todd Lehman
|
| | | (...) IMO, the reduced number of posts is due to fewer people currently accessing, compared to RTL. Keep in mind that these groups have only really been running publicly for 7 1/2 days, and that things will ramp up slowly. Three to six months from (...) (26 years ago, 12-Oct-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Lugnet's great signal to noise ratio —Mike Stanley
|
| | | | (...) The lack of propagation delays is one reason why I think people will be more likely to post here once they show up. Right now it might take days for people to see my posts, and sometimes it almost seems like a waste of time, especially for the (...) (26 years ago, 12-Oct-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Lugnet's great signal to noise ratio —Thomas Main
|
| | | | (...) I think the REAL benefit of LUGNET will the the ability to see Mike Stanley's posts almost instantly. Admittedly, we'll miss the sense of anticipation, as in, "I wonder which of Mike Stanley's posts will show up next." However, I think Mike (...) (26 years ago, 12-Oct-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Lugnet's great signal to noise ratio —Mike Stanley
|
| | | | (...) Whahahaha, good one. Like people sit around wondering what gibberish I'll post next. :) (...) Cool, glad to hear it. :) (26 years ago, 12-Oct-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Lugnet's great signal to noise ratio —Sarah Heacock
|
| | | | (...) *smile* Just keep thinking that way. Sarah Heacock sarah@eskimo.com (26 years ago, 15-Oct-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Lugnet's great signal to noise ratio —Mike Stanley
|
| | | | (...) See? I can always count on Sarah to keep me honest. :) (26 years ago, 15-Oct-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Lugnet's great signal to noise ratio —Sarah Heacock
|
| | | | (...) The people at work say the exact same thing. I don't understand why... Sarah (26 years ago, 15-Oct-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
