 | | Re: CLSOTW voting —Dan Jezek
|
| | | (...) This defeats the whole purpose of voting then. I wonder how much worth a vote has if Todd is ultimately going to select the site he wants. (...) Yes of course! I think about this every time I post in here. (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: CLSOTW voting —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | (...) Of course it doesn't. (...) You weren't listening. Go back and read what I wrote again. --Todd (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: CLSOTW voting —Matthew Miller
|
| | | | | (...) I think the point is that the sites are picked by Todd. The vote is there as a sort of aid. It's not an election. (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: CLSOTW voting —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | (...) Like I said, though, 9 times out of 10 (about) it is. --Todd (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | CLSOTW "voting" (was Re: CLSOTW voting —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Our input is important but it's not merely a popularity contest. A lot of stuff around here works that way... For instance, Spotlight: (URL) for one like it that way. I'd rather trust the judgement of someone whose aesthetics and sense of what (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: CLSOTW "voting" (was Re: CLSOTW voting —Tony Priestman
|
| | | | On Mon, 20 Dec 1999, Larry Pieniazek (<385DBE8B.AEE31E15@...ager.net>) wrote at 05:28:43 (...) Rock on. Democracies are usually run by minorities, anyway. And we all know how well committees work :-) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
