 | | my take on the 2000 leaks controversy —Jonathan Wilson
|
| | | Here is what I believe to be the rules about posting: 1.if it is from a 2000 consumer catalog anywhere in the world it is ok 2.if it is on the lego website, accessable from the lego main page somehow then it is ok 3.if it is on the lego website but (...) (25 years ago, 11-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: my take on the 2000 leaks controversy —Paul Davidson
|
| | | | | The rule of thumb as proposed by some appears to be that we should pretend the 2000 Lego doesn't even exist until 2002 rolls around. ;) -- Paul Davidson Jonathan Wilson <wilsonj@xoommail.com> wrote in message news:385214EE.BB7B7A...ail.com... (...) (25 years ago, 11-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: my take on the 2000 leaks controversy —Jonathan Wilson
|
| | | | | | (...) The only rules here are todds rules. -- Jonathan Wilson wilsonj@xoommail.com (URL) (25 years ago, 11-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: my take on the 2000 leaks controversy —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) I believe that Brad Justus will have some very interesting things to say next week, which we'll all want to listen very carefully to. That's what I would like to add. (URL) (25 years ago, 11-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
