 | | Re: 2000 pictures found on www,lego.com! (Again) —Ben Roller
|
| | | (...) This statement is crap. Why should we now hold back our true feelings and opinions of TLC or anything else? Lugnet has been searchable for as long as I've been here and because of that anyone should know that what's said today can be read (...) (25 years ago, 10-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: 2000 pictures found on www,lego.com! (Again) —Christian Gemuenden
|
| | | | | OK, I had to reply again... your arguments are totally right too, I just thought that we should calm this down a little. If Todd warns us with flaming he must have a serious reason for this. I don't think it is a problem for us to stop discussing (...) (25 years ago, 10-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: 2000 pictures found on www,lego.com! (Again) —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) That might be a bit harsh (like I should talk today ;o) but I agree. Now more than ever is when TLC needs our true feelings and opinions. (...) Yup!! (...) No, I'm a rotten meanie -- look: (URL) (25 years ago, 11-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
