 | | Re: Introducing LEGO Direct
|
|
3 Points 1. Well, I'm not surprised. By speaking to "LUGNet" Brad appears to think he is speaking to only US AFOL's. 2. Before promoting the Lego "brand", I'd sort the product out first 3. "we’re not yet able to handle a deluge of incoming e-mail". (...) (24 years ago, 10-Dec-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Introducing LEGO Direct
|
|
(...) I don't see how you get that out of Brad's message. Specifically, he said: (...) Sounds fairly world-wide to me. Steve (24 years ago, 10-Dec-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Introducing LEGO Direct
|
|
(...) I don't know where you get that...(?) He said "global" and "worldwide" in key places. (...) By someone legally empowered to use someone of power's legal signature, or by a real officiant? (...) Ha. (...) Well, one outta three ain't bad. --Todd (24 years ago, 10-Dec-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Introducing LEGO Direct
|
|
(...) Agreed. And as for LUGNET representing only the USA, I should say not! Although I would argue that LUGNET mainly represents English-speaking countries (but there has been a growing activity in Italy and Denmark... and maybe some others that I (...) (24 years ago, 10-Dec-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Introducing LEGO Direct
|
|
(...) Uhm.. Uhm.. can we play? I've heard of at least 6 confirmed memberships from the Netherlands. Jasper (24 years ago, 12-Dec-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Introducing LEGO Direct
|
|
(...) My point was they took the time to reply. Scott A (...) (23 years ago, 5-Mar-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
