 | | Re: Introducing LEGO Direct
|
| (...) Like for kvetching or a whinging/whining? :-) (...) Hmm, sticky point. (...) If Brad has no objections and could suggest a couple (or more, if he wants) sub-group topic areas that he and/or his colleagues would find most helpful, I'm all for (...) (25 years ago, 10-Dec-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Introducing LEGO Direct
|
| I would think as a minimum we'd need: dear-lego.bulk (requests to add a part to the service) dear-lego.rant dear-lego.sets (discuss what sets to rerelease, if that is ever a possibility - by rerelease, I mean the original set OR a remake like (...) (25 years ago, 10-Dec-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Introducing LEGO Direct
|
| (...) Just to clarify, my suggestion was meant to inspire the idea that a new hierchy be established (ie, "lugnet.lego-direct", "lugnet.lego-direct.bulk", etc), rather than skipping straight to segmenting lugnet.dear-lego. If the main group in the (...) (25 years ago, 10-Dec-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Introducing LEGO Direct
|
| (...) This strikes me as a Good Idea. James (URL) WAAHOO! (people have been looking at me funny since yesterday afternoon - I just can' stop the occaisional WAAHOO! from coming out. :) (25 years ago, 10-Dec-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Introducing LEGO Direct
|
| (...) No, but in the case of splitting the group into subgroups, the original charter wouldn't have to change. It's simply lugnet.dear-lego: Open letters to the LEGO Group (not necessarily to be read by anyone at LEGO) and that doesn't necessarily (...) (25 years ago, 10-Dec-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.admin.general)
| |
