| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Todd Lehman writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Tom Stangl writes:
> > Todd,
> > Let's face it, if TLC were THAT worried about the pics in the retailer
> > catalog getting out there, they wouldn't release it so early.
>
> Oh, gee, yeah, that certainly justifies it. :-/
>
> First, the retailer catalog was never "released" (to consumers). Retailer
> catalogs are sent to *retailers* for *retailers* to use for their businesses.
>
> Second, to the best of my knowledge, this year's retailer catalog hasn't even
> been sent to retailers in the U.S. yet. I don't know how or where Huw's
> so-called "correspondent" got a copy.
>
> Third, I said it before but I'll say it again: LEGO employees at the Mall
> of America LEGO Imagination Center had said that they could *lose their
> jobs* for showing a retailer catalog to consumers before the products were
> out on shelves.
>
> Let's be a little responsible as a community for once, for crying out loud.
> Are Suzanne and I the only ones who feel this way?
No. But I suspect you're the only ones that feel this strongly.
I've stated (somewhere) that I honestly don't think it (the scans being out
there) makes a difference, BUT that doesn't make it right.
Bottom line: Those retailer catalogues are the intellectual property of Lego.
If we don't respect them, why the heck should they respect us?
James
http://www.shades-of-night.com/lego/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
116 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
