Subject:
|
Re: COMPLETE LIST OF NEW SETS FOR 2000
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Sun, 5 Dec 1999 21:53:27 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1337 times
|
| |
|
|
I have to say that I agree with Suz. If that info is intended by TLC to be for
a limited audience, then perhaps spreading it over the 'net isn't the wisest
thing to condone, as AFOL's. I mean, here we are desperately trying to get them
onside with individual/bulk part sales, set design, and so on and on, and then
we (myself included, I looked at it all before I gave it a second thought) turn
around and pull something like this...
I know your intentions were good, and I appreciate the effort involved in
making the pics and so on available, but on second thought I think maybe ya
oopsed.
Now, if TLC doesn't really care one way or the other, great fine wonderful. But
JUST IN CASE it matters to them, I agree with Suz that erring on the side of
caution would be the prudent course of action. With that in mind I implore you
to pull the scans and your post.
K.M.
In lugnet.general, Suzanne D. Rich writes:
> In lugnet.announce, Huw Millington writes:
> > A correspondent has sent me this list, taken from the international
> > retailers catalogue.
> > Huw
>
> Huw,
>
> I will give you the benefit of the doubt and assume that your correspondent
> (name?) neglected their responsibility to inform you that the information
> passed
> along to you was meant only for retailers and then only for ordering purposes.
> The retailer catalog is traditionally a closely guarded item, never meant for
> public (including competitor) consumption.
>
> As a truly good intentioned LEGO enthusiast, I am asking you to remove these
> illegal scans from internet publication and also ask Todd to delete your
> previous post. This is in response to my desire to keep the delicate
> relationship between adult online enthusiasts and the LEGO Company intact. It
> also is protective of smaller retailers and of the LEGO Company itself. I • could
> go into a discussion of why what you have done is against the interest of the
> company, but I'll save it -- assuming you agree with the above.
>
> Please excuse my curt reaction, but I am quite stunned and alarmed.
>
> -Suz.
>
> These words are my own and in no way represent the position of MIT Media Lab.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: COMPLETE LIST OF NEW SETS FOR 2000
|
| (...) [confidential internal LEGO Company info snipped] (...) Huw, I will give you the benefit of the doubt and assume that your correspondent (name?) neglected their responsibility to inform you that the information passed along to you was meant (...) (25 years ago, 5-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
105 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
