 | | Re: Ninja vs. "real" Castle (was: Re: More news on 2000 lineup!) —Mike Petrucelli
|
| | | (...) I will take 50 shoguns over 50 kings anyday. Heck even 50 batlords are better than 50 of those stupid kings. The new 6026 would have been the set i likely would have wanted 50 of. Not with that @#$%&* king though. Also why dose 6095 have (...) (25 years ago, 11-Nov-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.castle)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Ninja vs. "real" Castle (was: Re: More news on 2000 lineup!) —David Eaton
|
| | | | (...) I WOULDN'T mind the three kings, but there aren't enough of the regular soldiers at ALL! By my count of "Royal Knights 2" figs: 6026 - 1 soldier + 1 king 6091 - 3 soldiers + 1 king + 1 princess (+2 moo men & 1 skeleton) 6094 - 1 soldier (+1 (...) (25 years ago, 11-Nov-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Ninja vs. "real" Castle (was: Re: More news on 2000 lineup!) —Mike Petrucelli
|
| | | | | (...) <sigh> Oh how I wish. At least we can make a decent barbarian horde. (Polybag, polybag, come on polybag.) (25 years ago, 12-Nov-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Ninja vs. "real" Castle (was: Re: More news on 2000 lineup!) —Don Herko
|
| | | | This part of the art of Lego. Adding to a theme to increase the size of the army. I took the newest and last armada soliders (green and red) and added them to the Woodsmen and old Lion Armies. They became officers or minor nobles whatever you wish (...) (25 years ago, 12-Nov-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | |
