 | | Re: Holy Mackerel! LEGO survey...
|
|
In lugnet.general, Dan Thompson wrote: Sorry for the reply to myself Jake please make sure this get passed on as well. Even if they are only read and never touched again. This is a mindset for myself living and growing up in the USA. This may not (...) (21 years ago, 20-Apr-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: If you could wish for any single Lego element, what would it be?
|
|
On Wed, April 20, 2005 7:44 am, danny staple said: (...) That's called a studless beam. :) With the latest trend towards studless stuff in Technic, I'd like a way to connect two beams at 90 degrees in the same plane. Something like this part: (URL) (...) (21 years ago, 20-Apr-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: If you could wish for any single Lego element, what would it be?
|
|
(...) The fluted column idea would be one I would definitely go for, just make it in old light gray. 2x2x11 seems like a bit too much in height, so mine would just be 2x2x2. Not too long ago (URL) Bill Vollbrecht> came up with a column design that I (...) (21 years ago, 20-Apr-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: If you could wish for any single Lego element, what would it be?
|
|
I have to admit Patrick - that really would be a worthwhile part - I also think that the inverse peice in a two-plate high design iwth stud receptacles on both sides would be a very useful peice. Wouldnt this be a matter better discussed in the (...) (21 years ago, 20-Apr-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: If you could wish for any single Lego element, what would it be?
|
|
I surely would like a lego piece with studs on both sides.Could be any color, plate height. Look this: (URL) Lane yahoo.co.uk>" <stevenrobertlane@<n...pamplease> escreveu na mensagem news:IF8M2E.qyv@lugnet.com... (...) start a (...) of any (...) (...) (21 years ago, 20-Apr-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)
|
