 | | Re: KKK described latest restructuring as "last chance" for Lego in FT article
|
|
(...) Because they paid for it at the corporate level and some upstart manager is overstepping his authority in not enforcing it? Just guessing here, but don't rule it out. (...) Yep. (...) Unless it's a violation of a marketing or space allocation (...) (22 years ago, 18-Mar-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: KKK described latest restructuring as "last chance" for Lego in FT article
|
|
(...) I do know that some products pay for space/location or donate displays in order to improve product placement (end-caps especially). Think about the center aisle pallet displays at WalMart that Lego does from time to time. I'm sure that's (...) (22 years ago, 17-Mar-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: More opinions needed - possible future Legends
|
|
(...) I am not sure I agree. See (URL) which is rereleased as (URL) but in different colors. Arguably that's a case where LEGO produced a "legend", isn't it? I think to say that they cannot do it may not be a universally held opinion. I think the (...) (22 years ago, 17-Mar-04, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: More opinions needed - possible future Legends
|
|
(...) I tend to agree, though they COULD reissue the very first castle, you know, the yellow one. ;-) I fear there may be no end to corporate wrongheadedness. Peace and lost legends, Professor Whateverly (22 years ago, 17-Mar-04, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: KKK described latest restructuring as "last chance" for Lego in FT article
|
|
(...) Actualy in my opinion it would be the best thing that could happen for an AFOL is for LEGO to be bought out by another toy company or if LEGO went public. Than any issues we had could be directly raised with the senior management at the annual (...) (22 years ago, 17-Mar-04, to lugnet.general)
|
