 | | Re: KKK described latest restructuring as "last chance" for Lego in FT article
|
|
(...) Because they paid for it at the corporate level and some upstart manager is overstepping his authority in not enforcing it? Just guessing here, but don't rule it out. (...) Yep. (...) Unless it's a violation of a marketing or space allocation (...) (22 years ago, 18-Mar-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
 | | Re: KKK described latest restructuring as "last chance" for Lego in FT article
|
|
(...) I do know that some products pay for space/location or donate displays in order to improve product placement (end-caps especially). Think about the center aisle pallet displays at WalMart that Lego does from time to time. I'm sure that's (...) (22 years ago, 17-Mar-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
 | | Re: More opinions needed - possible future Legends
|
|
(...) I am not sure I agree. See (URL) which is rereleased as (URL) but in different colors. Arguably that's a case where LEGO produced a "legend", isn't it? I think to say that they cannot do it may not be a universally held opinion. I think the (...) (22 years ago, 17-Mar-04, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.general)
|
| |
 | | Re: More opinions needed - possible future Legends
|
|
(...) I tend to agree, though they COULD reissue the very first castle, you know, the yellow one. ;-) I fear there may be no end to corporate wrongheadedness. Peace and lost legends, Professor Whateverly (22 years ago, 17-Mar-04, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.general)
|
| |
 | | Re: KKK described latest restructuring as "last chance" for Lego in FT article
|
|
(...) Actualy in my opinion it would be the best thing that could happen for an AFOL is for LEGO to be bought out by another toy company or if LEGO went public. Than any issues we had could be directly raised with the senior management at the annual (...) (22 years ago, 17-Mar-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
 | | Re: More opinions needed - possible future Legends
|
|
(...) Hi. I think, the survey is nonsense. LEGO cannot produce any more legends, because the colors needed are no more available. Regards Ronald (22 years ago, 17-Mar-04, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.general) !!
|
| |
 | | Re: More opinions needed - possible future Legends
|
|
(...) Firstly, all of the themes listed seemed rather minfig-centric, with the exception of "large sculptures". Not TECHNIC, no DUPLO, no Designer (shoot, I just realized I could have asked for Space and Castle X-Pods) Secondly (and this is (...) (22 years ago, 17-Mar-04, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
 | | Re: More opinions needed - possible future Legends
|
|
(...) In the first survey, if memory serves me, someone went through the suggestions, cleaned up, simplified, or combined suggestions, and then added it to the list. There were numerous adds - my suggestion regarding Pirates was slightly reworded, (...) (22 years ago, 17-Mar-04, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.general)
|
| |
 | | Re: KKK described latest restructuring as "last chance" for Lego in FT article
|
|
snippage (...) Disney had the law changed to get an extension. Disney has way too much pwer/money (URL) (22 years ago, 17-Mar-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
 | | Re: More opinions needed - possible future Legends
|
|
(...) of good opportunities to voice our opinions. One thing though - why isn't TechnicMindStorms listed? I'd hardly call it "all-new" (though here's to hoping ;) ). -Mike (22 years ago, 17-Mar-04, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.general, FTX)
|