 | | Re: Scans from new danish 2004 catalog
|
|
In lugnet.general, Eric Brok wrote: (snip) (...) OOPS, I was wrong! Please take note the above statement is false. I was writing from memory and checked it when I got home. As it turned out, the Danish and Dutch catalog are simply the same WRT skin (...) (22 years ago, 3-Feb-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New Skin Tones coming? (was: Re: Scans from new danish 2004 catalog)
|
|
(...) I've always liked Steve Bliss's idea from 1998 or so: (URL) (As you can see from my reply there. *grin*) But I don't think they're going to do that. (22 years ago, 3-Feb-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New Skin Tones coming? (was: Re: Scans from new danish 2004 catalog)
|
|
(...) I think that's unlikely. It certainly *decrease* the appeal to me. That's obviously a small sample size, but I've been right before. :) (...) Possibly. I don't mind the not-exact-classic-smiley faces, but I *do* prefer the ones that are more (...) (22 years ago, 3-Feb-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Lore on Lego vs. Legos
|
|
(...) My favorite line from Star Trek: TNG when Pulaski refers to Data as Dah-ta and says "What's the difference?" to which he replies "One is my name, the other is not." -Brian P. Gefrich LEGO Pet Peeve Guy (22 years ago, 3-Feb-04, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Lore on Lego vs. Legos
|
|
(...) It's not just any blog. (...) Sure, I'll *spell* it right. :) (...) Setting it back, because What-Ever. (22 years ago, 3-Feb-04, to lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.general)
|
