 | | Re: WorldLUG into public domain
|
|
(...) While this may be the "ideal" scenerio, it is also the one that is least likely to happen. Todd and Suz have done a great thing here with Lugnet. Lets keep in mind, however, that Lugnet was SUPPOSED to be the all-encompasing site for Lego fans (...) (22 years ago, 2-Feb-04, to lugnet.general, FTX) !
|
| |
| | Re: New Skin Tones coming? (was: Re: Scans from new danish 2004 catalog)
|
|
(...) Minifigs are one of the huge appeal of Lego, at least to people from my generation. (The first sets I had had the armless variety.) Mucking with that doesn't seem like a great idea to me either. (22 years ago, 2-Feb-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New Skin Tones coming? (was: Re: Scans from new danish 2004 catalog)
|
|
(...) I think he's saying that if you want fleshtoned figures that have some of the other features you ask for, maybe Playmobil may suit your needs better. I'm not sure I agree. but I am also not sure I think that changing from yellow to fleshtones (...) (22 years ago, 2-Feb-04, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New Skin Tones coming? (was: Re: Scans from new danish 2004 catalog)
|
|
(...) What is your point? That because Playmobil uses flesh tones TLC shouldn't? I'm sorry but I don't get your drift. JOHN (22 years ago, 2-Feb-04, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: WorldLUG into public domain
|
|
(...) LUGNET leaves a lot to be desired as a single point of entry, I think. It's confusing to navigate - especially for newbies, and doesn't do a good job of linking out to other sites from obvious places - ie guide.lugnet.com/shop doesn't even (...) (22 years ago, 2-Feb-04, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
