 | | Re: High praise for Designer Set #4100
|
|
The morning after I read your review I got the set for my birthday! You're absolutely right. But rather than just a 'metoo' post I wanted to add something. What I really like about the models (I've only built a few so far) is that none of them is (...) (22 years ago, 19-Apr-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Some Weird Action Team turns 4 years old!
|
|
(...) Oh, okay. Thanks, but I was wondering if you knew any kind of free web hoster ((URL) for instance) although different. I tried to make a site once, I didn't get any visitors except for me, and it was hard. Also, do you have any tips on making (...) (22 years ago, 19-Apr-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | After a failure you have to bounce back
|
|
Well, Last question of Top 10 lists was: Top 10 LEGO recors it would be fun to watch someone break. It didn't generate enough answers, so we dropped it. Apart from stucking parts up your nose or swallowing then, there was nothing really interesting. (...) (22 years ago, 19-Apr-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.fun, lugnet.announce) !
|
| |
| | Re: For some Lego is a religous experience. (Was: Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community)
|
|
I went the other way once in a Sunday morning service some time ago. I made a parable using an ordinary LEGO brick, a LEGO minifig gun, and a 100% compatible 2x4 clone brick. I asked some children to point out which one was not a Lego part, and of (...) (22 years ago, 19-Apr-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.fun.community)
|
| |
| | To Thomas Stangl (positive stuff)
|
|
Hey Tom, this is Nick. After reading over the various posts, I still stand by my "my comment was stupid" post and think that the whole argument was stupid anyway. Lets just forget about it. I can actually see your point of view. Truce? Thanks, ~Nick (22 years ago, 19-Apr-03, to lugnet.general)
|
