To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.gaming.starshipOpen lugnet.gaming.starship in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Gaming / Starship / *654 (-5)
  Re: Galactic Reports 04/10/04
 
(...) Same thing. Could this be on my end? -Dan (20 years ago, 14-Apr-04, to lugnet.gaming.starship, FTX)
 
  Re: Galactic Reports 04/10/04
 
(...) snip (...) Hey Dan. That wasn't intended. I will send it again now. Let me know if it looks okay... -SM Hendo (20 years ago, 14-Apr-04, to lugnet.gaming.starship, FTX)
 
  Re: Galactic Reports 04/10/04
 
(...) Hendo, one minor problem. All I got for the Hell's Fury was: Starship: VALCENTRAL: USS Hell’s Fury (URL) Status: USS Hell’s Fury === Coordinates: Orbiting at G1; Away Team at Formian Colony Clanesk, Darpenime No actions. Maybe this was (...) (20 years ago, 14-Apr-04, to lugnet.gaming.starship, FTX)
 
  Re: RulesTalk: SMs and Running more than one Sector
 
All looked eminently sensible to me. I'd only reinforce the point about the need to ensure that as an SM one is up to running two sectors. I have had on average 6 or 7 ships active in New Pacific most of the time, and for me that's a chunk to do. (...) (20 years ago, 14-Apr-04, to lugnet.gaming.starship)
 
  Galactic Reports 04/10/04
 
Galactic Greetings! Travel reports have been emailed as appropriate. There have been a lot of new ships in recent weeks, so if anyone feels they have been missed, please let me know. I also mailed out actions for my sectors as needed. And finally, (...) (20 years ago, 14-Apr-04, to lugnet.gaming.starship, FTX)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR