Subject:
|
Re: MiniFig Death...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.gaming
|
Date:
|
Tue, 9 May 2000 13:58:33 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
wubwub@#SayNoToSpam#wildlink.com
|
Viewed:
|
1371 times
|
| |
|
|
"Mike Rayhawk" <mjr22@cornell.edu> wrote:
> In lugnet.fun.gaming, Stephen F. Roberts writes:
> > http://wildlink.com/lego/minifigdeath/
> >
> > ...I'll add stuff to make the weapons more unique and all later, just
> > wanted to get out a
> > rough for comments and all :-) LMKWYT
>
> I like this a lot - it avoids all the long game setup and tables referencing
> that are such a pain. I think that if you add stuff to make the weapons more
> unique, you'll have to be careful about it - if you add too much detail in
> that area, you'll need to add more tables and it will be a step back in the
> wrong direction.
thanks for the vote of confidence!
...yea... I was thinking of making the weapons mods simple like '+1TH' or cheaper for -1"
move... so a force could have unique weapons... but 'encourage' the designer to
standardize on one or two weapons for his whole army to try desperately to avoid paper
during the game (and as little paper before hand as possible too). Im going to rework to
vehicle things to make them easier to just play... (which was the idea afterall...)
...you can go back to ignoring me now...
wubwub
stephen f roberts
wamalug guy (http://wamalug.org)
wildlink.com
lugnet #160
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: MiniFig Death...
|
| (...) I like this a lot - it avoids all the long game setup and tables referencing that are such a pain. I think that if you add stuff to make the weapons more unique, you'll have to be careful about it - if you add too much detail in that area, (...) (25 years ago, 9-May-00, to lugnet.gaming)
|
3 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
