 | | Re: 'Mech Damage Question —Chris Yoder
|
| | | (...) So, the attacker gets to choose which type they want to use? ~Clangador (20 years ago, 10-Jun-04, to lugnet.gaming, lugnet.gaming.brikwars)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: 'Mech Damage Question —Mike Rayhawk
|
| | | | (...) It's more the difference between the attacker saying "I attack your mech" and "I attack the inner joint of your mech's left elbow." If he attacks a specific part, then he can use component damage. If he attacks the mech in general, then he (...) (20 years ago, 11-Jun-04, to lugnet.gaming.brikwars)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 'Mech Damage Question —Chris Yoder
|
| | | | (...) Okay. I'm digging it. My friend, who I'll be playing against next Sunday asked me this question. If he builds covers over the joints of his mecha, will that prevent an attack against the joint until the cover is blasted away? It seems like it (...) (20 years ago, 14-Jun-04, to lugnet.gaming.brikwars)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 'Mech Damage Question —Mike Rayhawk
|
| | | | (...) Well-built models will always have an advantage over poorly-built models. That's completely intentional. The question isn't about whether a properly-armored mech has an unfair advantage, but rather, why would anyone pay full CP and then not (...) (20 years ago, 14-Jun-04, to lugnet.gaming.brikwars)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 'Mech Damage Question —Chris Yoder
|
| | | | (...) Well, it makes sense. I didn't know if it was intentional or not. I've seen pictures of 'Mechs (in BrikWars) that have unarmored joints. ~Clangador (20 years ago, 14-Jun-04, to lugnet.gaming.brikwars)
|
| | | | |
