Subject:
|
Re: 'Mech Damage Question
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.gaming.brikwars
|
Date:
|
Mon, 14 Jun 2004 08:06:32 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
6071 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.gaming.brikwars, Chris Yoder wrote:
> Okay. I'm digging it. My friend, who I'll be playing against next Sunday
> asked me this question. If he builds covers over the joints of his mecha,
> will that prevent an attack against the joint until the cover is blasted
> away? It seems like it would to me. The thing that bothers me about this
> is that the better build/protected mech will have an advantage over other
> mechs. Someone could spend time building in extra protection for all their
> joints at no extra cost in CP. I know this game is suppose to be somewhat
> light hearted, but it is still a wargame and people like to win. I know my
> friend will be doing his best to squeak ever advantage out of the rules.
Well-built models will always have an advantage over poorly-built models.
That's completely intentional.
The question isn't about whether a properly-armored mech has an unfair
advantage, but rather, why would anyone pay full CP and then not bother to armor
the joints?
- Mike.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: 'Mech Damage Question
|
| (...) Okay. I'm digging it. My friend, who I'll be playing against next Sunday asked me this question. If he builds covers over the joints of his mecha, will that prevent an attack against the joint until the cover is blasted away? It seems like it (...) (20 years ago, 14-Jun-04, to lugnet.gaming.brikwars)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
