|
|
 | | Active Sectors
|
| Hello all. I've kept in touch with many of the players of Starship, and I know if they are still playing the game or not. This table may be a bit wrong, but if the sector is active, please inform me to change it. Active Sectors Arbor Sector Sector X (...) (21 years ago, 3-May-04, to lugnet.gaming.starship, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Floating. or I've joined- what next?
|
| In lugnet.gaming.starship, Avery Christy summed lots of stuff up: (...) -snip- (...) -snip- Just a final note on the emails, which Avery summed up nicely. Some SMs like to send Action Emails to players in their sector, which are basically a form (...) (21 years ago, 3-May-04, to lugnet.gaming.starship, FTX)
| | | | | Re: ESPG Rule Mod?
|
| "Wes Davis" <kitsurugi_yui@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:Hx0vwM.1vCB@lugnet.com... (...) bought a (...) it. (...) curious. (...) I don't think I've had that much trouble with stuff walking. But that concern is one reason I am looking for a way (...) (21 years ago, 3-May-04, to lugnet.gaming, lugnet.pirates)
| | | | | Re: ESPG Rule Mod?
|
| "Mr L F Braun" <braunli1@pilot.msu.edu> wrote in message news:Hx1Bxn.1rFx@lugnet.com... (...) I'd say (...) cutters (...) enough for (...) My biggest concern with adding draught is the added complexity for not that much gain. I also don't want to (...) (21 years ago, 3-May-04, to lugnet.gaming, lugnet.pirates)
| | | | | Re: ESPG Rule Mod?
|
| "Purple Dave" <purpledave@maskofdestiny.com> wrote in message news:Hx1Lxu.zFE@lugnet.com... (...) Imperial... (...) only... Very good points. Chris Weeks and I have talked about how to make non-pirates viable as players. We just have not come up (...) (21 years ago, 3-May-04, to lugnet.gaming, lugnet.pirates)
|
|
