| | Re: Final Official Statement - Maersk Second Run
|
|
(...) Thanks a lot for this, Mark! Since ages I haven't enjoyed any other Lugnet posting as much as this one! Even greater if it could become (at least in parts) true one day. Ben (20 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.fun.holiday, FTX)
|
|
| | Re: Final Official Statement - Maersk Second Run
|
|
(...) You're jumping the gun for April 1st, 2005. What a sick joke. -Bryan (20 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.fun.holiday, FTX)
|
|
| | Re: Final Official Statement - Maersk Second Run
|
|
(...) Erm, yes, point taken. ;-) (20 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.fun.holiday, FTX)
|
|
| | Re: Final Official Statement - Maersk Second Run
|
|
(...) Ahh yes. I recall last year someone posted an announcement 'transcript' from a Danish newspaper claiming lego was going to change its brick geometry. (...) Since when are juniorised models 'something' anyway? ;-) Unlike Kelly I was lucky (...) (20 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.fun.holiday, FTX)
|
|
| | Re: Final Official Statement - Maersk Second Run
|
|
(...) Large numbers of early april dates are usually a good indicator... :-) (...) Hmm... I got a very nice juniorised model and advice that there was nothing wrong with my browser. :-) (20 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.fun.holiday, FTX)
|