Subject:
|
Re: Are you obsessed?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.fun.community
|
Date:
|
Tue, 15 Oct 2002 18:51:55 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2845 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.fun.community, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > In lugnet.fun.community, Bruce Hietbrink writes:
> > >
> > > http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/Hietbrink/Legopoll/survey.txt
>
> What's the provenance of this? It feels kind of like the "LEGO purity test"
> that was floating around years and years ago, as well as a bit like
> Todd's(1) Lego Quiz that was on the Fibblesnork site.
Yes, in fact my hazy memory seems to recall that Todd either wrote the
original Lego-purity test, or his Fibblesnork survey was based directly on
it (I can't remember which). Also, some of Todd's recent Lugnet Polls
seemed to be from that same old list. Nonetheless, I always find these
sorts of things to be fun, and it is especially nice to see such a thing
focused on one of our favorite interests.
Curiously, I scored the same exact score as on my "normal, non-Lego" purity
test: 69. (Of course, the "normal" one was taken over ten years ago, so I'm
sure my score is now worse, but it seems such an appropriate number to stay
with.) As for this Lego quiz, I'd have done better, but instead of spending
money to go to Legolands or BrickFests, I've always just bought more bricks.
...Oh, and if you are thinking of adding questions (as others have added
some elsewhere in this thread), most good purity tests end with a question
like, "Have you ever done something indicated elsewhere in this test just to
get a better score?"
Cheers,
-Hendo
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Are you obsessed?
|
| (...) that was floating around years and years ago, as well as a bit like Todd's(1) Lego Quiz that was on the Fibblesnork site. Thanks for sharing. (...) Only if you already know that you're obsessed. LOL. BTW: 89% 1 - if you need a last name to (...) (22 years ago, 14-Oct-02, to lugnet.fun.community)
|
25 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
