 | | Re: Lego admits minifigs are better than Jack Stone figs! —Carter Lance
| | | | (...) (22 years ago, 16-May-02, to lugnet.fun, lugnet.general)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Lego admits minifigs are better than Jack Stone figs! —Matt Hein
| | | | | (...) Ha ha ha!!! I was right all along! Seriously, though...why did Lego even bother to concieve the concept of Jack Stone? Was there any merit in attempting to create a so called "action hero" that nobody has ever heard of? I think not. Anyway, (...) (22 years ago, 16-May-02, to lugnet.fun, lugnet.general)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Lego admits minifigs are better than Jack Stone figs! —John P. Henderson
| | | | | (...) some reason, this thread/post/link triggered the heartiest laugh I have had all day. At first I think it was just the layout of the comparison, which is similar to so many other "fluff things" I have seen in mainstream magazines, only since (...) (22 years ago, 17-May-02, to lugnet.fun, lugnet.general)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Lego admits minifigs are better than Jack Stone figs! —Larry Pieniazek
| | | | | (...) It HAD to be satirical. In real life Jack Stone does not have any friends. Leastwise not among MY minifigs anyway. FUT ot.fun (22 years ago, 17-May-02, to lugnet.fun, lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | | |
