 | | Re: 'Stubbies' © Richard & (maybe) Matthew —Richard Noeckel
|
| | | <cough thief cough> O.K. fine, you can have the term ‘Stubbies’ © But the term ‘Stubby’ is MINE! [TM, ©, ® etc.] You can receive the royalties for the plural, and I'll accept the profits for the singular term… sounds fair? I won’t forget this, you (...) (23 years ago, 30-Oct-01, to lugnet.fun, lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: 'Stubbies' © Richard (and he can have 'em if he wants 'em!) —Matthew Gerber
|
| | | | | (...) 'Cause I was just funnin' with you, perhaps? [1] 8?P Matt [1] Say, thse footnotes are kinda' fun too! (23 years ago, 30-Oct-01, to lugnet.fun, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: 'Stubbies' © Compromise… —Richard Noeckel
|
| | | | | | (...) Well duh, I knew that…. <scrambles to retrieve killer monkeys> (...) What does that mean…’perhaps?’ I think it means that deep down we both want some kind recognition for this ground-breaking revelation. It was fine before, you can have the (...) (23 years ago, 30-Oct-01, to lugnet.fun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: 'Stubbies' © Compromise… —Benjamin Medinets
|
| | | | | | (...) So this is what you guys were doing.... having a debate on who discovered the right catch phrase....its fun watching the war on words... :) Just a reminder....sometimes the footnotes can lead you into trouble, especially with certain other (...) (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.fun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: 'Stubbies' © Richard & (maybe) Matthew —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | (...) Actually Aussie beer companies have been using "stubby" (singular & plural for small bottles of beer for many years. Maybe your lawyer can talk to their lawyer 8?) ROSCO (23 years ago, 30-Oct-01, to lugnet.fun)
|
| | | | |
