To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.funOpen lugnet.fun in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Fun / *1353 (-10)
  Re: Constructive criticism vs. sugar coating (was: Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community)
 
(...) Ummm...no, that would be me. (21 years ago, 18-Apr-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.fun.community)
 
  Re: Constructive criticism vs. sugar coating (was: Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community)
 
(...) Hi Tim, I've been reading this post with fascination and hope I'm not replying too late. First, thanks for bringing up such an interesting topic! For me, LUGNET is a great way to catch up on Lego-related news, and I consider myself a member of (...) (21 years ago, 18-Apr-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.fun.community)
 
  Re: Fun with babelfish
 
Here's one: Castle rules, space stinks. Then to Korean and back... The castle governs space offensive odor. Another: Castle is boring, space can be excting. After: The castle is piercing, space can be emotive. Another: Why would anybody play with (...) (21 years ago, 18-Apr-03, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.fun)
 
  Constructive criticism vs. sugar coating (was: Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community)
 
Hi Mike - Great comments! (...) Yep. I think it's not too cool when people are afraid to post constructive criticism. I think though, people only get upset at posters when they say something blatantly negative about a model - which discourages (...) (21 years ago, 18-Apr-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.fun.community)
 
  Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community
 
(...) My personal feeling is that there are some unwritten rules that strongly *discourage* talking about a LEGO model that someone posts. I certainly have the impression that no matter how well-intentioned, if there is a single sentence in a (...) (21 years ago, 18-Apr-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.fun.community)
 
  Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community
 
(...) I definitely concur on that point. (...) On many points, I hear ya there. I'm trying to bring discussions about the community out in the open, since my efforts behind the scenes and in personal projects have not been successful - partially due (...) (21 years ago, 18-Apr-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.fun.community)
 
  Re: Vidsig
 
(...) Ummm, Anyone? Cheers (*clink*) Dean (21 years ago, 17-Apr-03, to lugnet.fun)
 
  Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community
 
(...) From someone whose interest has waned... Lugnet and the clubs that have formed through meeting here have a collective personality, for better or worse. I find this community to be competitive, opinionated and territorial. That's okay. I can be (...) (21 years ago, 17-Apr-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.fun.community)
 
  Re: Absolutely Nothing! :) (Was: Re: What's so Adult about it Anyway ?)
 
(...) Hi David! Although I am no longer among the faithful, I must agree with the sentiment that there is value in keeping young at heart! Religious or not, I love your explanation of how you have come to appreciate the importance of being a child. (...) (21 years ago, 17-Apr-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.fun.community)
 
  Re: Meet the Johnson Family!
 
(...) MOAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! *evil grin* Best regards, /Tobbe (URL) SPAM when e-mailing) (21 years ago, 17-Apr-03, to lugnet.fun, lugnet.fabuland)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR